It’s not the same anymore for Jammu & Kashmir nomads
Akshay Azad
Since
decades the family of Farzoola Mohammad (50) had been camping at village
Kullian in RS Pura sector during rainy season. The family would rent a small
tract of land and stay there for at least two-three months. But this year the
landlord returned the advance amount to Farzoola, refusing to rent out his land
without citing any reasons.
Farzool’s
predicament is shared by several other nomads across Hindu-majority areas in
Jammu region. Something has suddenly changed for the nomadic Gujjar and
Bakerwal communities after the sensational rape and murder of an eight-year-old
Bakerwal child came to light in Kathua in January 2018. Amid calls of economic
boycott of pastoral nomadic communities, several tribal families have
reportedly started migrating to other states.
The
call followed the charge-sheet filed by the Crime Branch, claiming that the
girl was brutally murdered to instil fear among the nomadic communities and
dislodge them from the village where they had been camping every summer
Earlier
this year, Ankur Sharma, lawyer of accused in the gang rape and murder case,
had given a call for social and economic boycott of Gujjar and Bakerwals in
Jammu. The call followed the charge-sheet filed by the Crime Branch, claiming
that the girl was brutally murdered to instill fear among the nomadic
communities and dislodge them from the village where they had been camping
every summer.
Said
Omparkash Khajuria (45), a human rights activist, “Majority of local residents
have stopped renting out land to the Muslim nomads in several areas. The
controversial minutes of a meeting held by tribal ministry earlier this year
have made local settlers wary of nomads who traditionally camp on their lands.”
Claiming
that his neighbours and relatives, who earlier used to rent out their land to
the nomads have now stopped the age-old practice, Khajuria explained: “In the
areas along the International Border with the Pakistan, the settlers mostly
don’t have ownership rights over their land that is state land.
The
propaganda that nomads now can’t be forcibly evicted from the state land has
discouraged farmers from renting out their land to the nomadic families.”He
added that “There is a popular perception among local settlers that Kashmir
centric and Muslim dominated state government would invariably side with the
Muslim nomads in the event of any conflict”.
Secretary
of Tribal Research and Cultural Foundation, Dr. Javed Rahi said that the former
Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti had instructed the Deputy Commissioners as well
as police officers not to disturb the nomads settled on the government land. “A
wrong impression has been created among local residents across Jammu province
that nomads are land-encroachers. That once they would settle on their private
land, it would become impossible to get them evicted,” Rahi stated.
Makhan
Din (73) recalled his childhood, when his family would undertake seasonal
migration from Bhaderwah in mountainous Doda district to the plains of RS Pura
in Jammu. “There were very few houses in the villages in RS Pura in early 70’s.
Most of the land was uncultivable in RS Pura, Bishnah and adjoining areas.
There was no paucity of grazing land for the livestock. In the absence of
chemical fertilizers, crop production was quite low, and the local residents
were dependent on nomads for manure,” Din recalled.
The
white bearded septuagenarian added, “During those days, local farmers would
provide us shelter besides wood and fodder merely in exchange of dung for
growing food crops on their farms.”“Now the chemical fertilisers have replaced
manure and increased crop production.
Tractors have made ploughing easy and
converted vast tracts of uncultivable area into cultivable land. Even the state
land and grazing pastures have been converted into agricultural fields,” Din
stated, adding that, “now local residents don’t need our help anymore.”
Din
is now settled on five kanal plot in village Mesian in Miran Sahib tehsil of
Jammu district. But the number of nomads like Din, who own some land, is quite
miniscule whereas majority of pastoral nomads remain landless.
Another
Gujjar stationed at village Chadwal in Kathua district, Gulam Mohammad, said:
“Earlier there were very few roads in the villages and hardly any motorcars.
Either camels or horse carts are used to transport goods. So the local
residents were heavily dependent on us. But with the advent of modes of modern
transportation, things have changed.”
Assistant
Professor in Department of Social Work, Central University of Jammu Iqbal Bhat
corroborated his views, stressing that the capitalistic development model,
driven by technology and market has adversely impacted the relationship between
nomads and settlers. “The symbiotic relationship has shifted to a
money-oriented relationship,” Bhat, who has been studying Modernity and
Nomadism: Bakerwal in context, observed.
Amid
growing acrimony that followed communalisation of rape and murder case coupled
with other factors, Tribal Research and Cultural Foundation claimed that
several nomadic families have started migrating to other states such as Punjab,
Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand.
“The
Banhara (who lives in forests) Gujjars of Jammu, Samba, Kathua, Kishtwar and
Udhampur districts are migrating to other states permanently, for the last few
years, as they are facing an extreme shortage of fodder, space for their
animals besides security and other reasons,” Rahi said.“In absence of forest
rights in J&K, closures on government lands, insurgency, Pakistan firing on
borders, low rates of milk products and because of growing communal tensions,
the nomad Gujjars are leaving our state gradually,” he added. “Once they leave
this place, there will be no question of their return lawfully, in view of the
special status of the state.”
The
writer is a Jammu based journalist and media fellow with National Foundation
for India
Comments
Post a Comment